eastbaycyber

CVE-2026-57700: Critical Arbitrary File Upload Vulnerability

CVE explainers 9 min read
SR
Security Research Desk Expert reviewed
Threat intelligence · Human-verified · Updated 2026-06-25
▲ Escalation ViewOne CVE, briefed at three altitudes — skim the Brief, weigh the Impact, or work the Runbook. The way a SOC actually reads it.
CISOBrief · 30-second brief
Field Value
CVE ID CVE-2026-57700
CVSS score 10.0
Attack vector Unknown from available primary source data
Auth required Unknown from available primary source data
Patch status Fixed version not confirmed from available sources
Affected product Daan.dev OMGF Pro
Affected versions Through 5.2.6
Exploitation in the wild Not confirmed
Public PoC Not confirmed

TL;DR - CVE-2026-57700 is a critical arbitrary file upload flaw in OMGF Pro through 5.2.6. - If you run OMGF Pro, assume high risk and investigate writable upload paths immediately. - Exploitation and PoC are not confirmed, but urgency is still high due to the bug class.

What is CVE-2026-57700 and why it matters

CVE-2026-57700 is a critical vulnerability in the Daan.dev OMGF Pro WordPress plugin. The NVD describes it as an “Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type” issue, which is the classic arbitrary file upload class. The affected range currently confirmed by the available primary record is “through 5.2.6.” In practical terms, that means version 5.2.6 is vulnerable, and defenders should treat 5.2.6 and earlier in the tracked product line as exposed unless vendor guidance narrows that scope.

This vulnerability class matters because arbitrary file upload flaws often become an initial access path. In WordPress environments, if an attacker can upload a malicious file into a web-accessible or executable location, the result may be full site compromise. That can include web shell deployment, credential theft, plugin tampering, content injection, or lateral movement into the hosting environment. The exact exploit path for this CVE is not publicly confirmed in the source material provided, so defenders should avoid assumptions about the precise endpoint or whether authentication is required. But operationally, the risk is still severe because the weakness allows dangerous file types to be accepted somewhere they should not be.

AnalystImpact · assess the risk

Affected versions and fixed version status

The currently verified affected version statement is:

  • Product: Daan.dev OMGF Pro
  • Affected versions: through 5.2.6

The phrase “from n/a through 5.2.6” is important. It confirms that 5.2.6 is vulnerable, but it does not provide a precise lower bound. That means the first affected version is unknown from the currently available primary data. In the absence of a lower bound, security teams should assume all deployed OMGF Pro versions up to and including 5.2.6 may be affected until a vendor advisory states otherwise.

The fixed version number is not confirmed from the available NVD, Patchstack title, and vendor product page data supplied here. That is an important uncertainty, and it should be stated plainly: there is no source-backed fixed version number available in the provided research note. Defenders should not guess. Instead, they should monitor the vendor product page and updated advisories for the exact remediated release. Until then, treat any instance on 5.2.6 or earlier as needing compensating controls or temporary isolation.

Exploitation status: is it being used, and is there a PoC?

At the time of writing, exploitation in the wild is not confirmed. The CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, which means there is no KEV-backed confirmation of active exploitation. That does not prove the flaw is not being exploited. It only means there is no CISA-confirmed evidence in KEV right now. For defenders, the right assumption is that a critical arbitrary file upload in a WordPress plugin may become attractive quickly, especially once researchers or attackers identify the vulnerable request flow.

A public proof of concept is also not confirmed from the available source set. The research note explicitly found no directly attributable PoC for CVE-2026-57700. Again, that should not be overread. Lack of a public PoC does not materially reduce the urgency of triage for internet-facing WordPress assets. Many real-world compromises happen before a clean, public exploit write-up appears. The defensive takeaway is straightforward: PoC unknown, active exploitation unknown, but bug class and CVSS both justify immediate review and mitigation.

What defenders should do first

The first step is asset identification. Many organizations have incomplete visibility into WordPress plugin inventories, especially in SMB environments, agency-managed sites, or decentralized marketing stacks. You need to identify every WordPress installation running OMGF Pro, then determine whether the plugin version is 5.2.6 or earlier. If you use managed hosting, check both the WordPress admin interface and the filesystem on disk, because staging systems and inactive plugin copies may still be present.

The second step is exposure reduction. Because the fixed version is not yet confirmed from the available sources, you should not stop at “wait for patch details.” Review whether the affected site can be temporarily shielded behind WAF rules, maintenance mode, IP allowlists, or reduced administrative exposure. If the site is business-critical and cannot be taken offline, prioritize monitoring for suspicious uploads and harden file execution behavior in writable directories. That is especially relevant on Apache and Nginx deployments where uploaded PHP or similarly executable content could be invoked directly if mishandled.

Bottom line

CVE-2026-57700 is a critical arbitrary file upload vulnerability affecting Daan.dev OMGF Pro through 5.2.6. The exact attack vector, authentication requirement, and fixed version are not confirmed in the currently available primary data, so defenders should avoid making up details. What is known is enough to act: the bug class is serious, the CVSS is 10.0, and WordPress file upload flaws can quickly lead to full site compromise.

At this time, exploitation in the wild is not confirmed, a public PoC is not confirmed, and the CVE is not in CISA KEV. Even so, organizations running OMGF Pro should inventory affected instances immediately, monitor for suspicious uploads and executable artifacts, apply compensating controls to writable paths, and upgrade as soon as the vendor publishes a confirmed fixed version.

For further reading, check out our guides on Incident Response Plans and Indicators of Compromise.

ResponderRunbook · act now

Detection and threat hunting

Detection for arbitrary file upload issues in WordPress has two layers: request-side evidence and file-system-side evidence. On the request side, look for unusual POST requests to WordPress endpoints, plugin-related routes, or admin-ajax handlers associated with file operations. Since the exact vulnerable endpoint is not confirmed in the current source material, defenders should broaden the search beyond a single URI and look for multipart form uploads, suspicious content types, or requests that return success codes followed by immediate file access attempts.

On the host side, investigate writable directories for newly created executable or script-like files. In WordPress compromises, suspicious artifacts often appear under wp-content/uploads/, plugin directories, temporary directories, or custom cache paths. The OMGF Pro product’s function involves local hosting and asset handling, so defenders should pay special attention to plugin-managed storage locations and any unexpected .php, .phtml, .phar, .php5, or disguised double-extension files such as image.jpg.php. If file integrity monitoring is available, diff recent changes in wp-content/ and plugin directories against known-good baselines.

Technical Notes

Review web server access logs for suspicious upload patterns. Concrete examples include:

POST /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=---------------------------

POST /wp-content/plugins/host-google-fonts-pro/ HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: multipart/form-data

GET /wp-content/uploads/2026/06/shell.php HTTP/1.1
GET /wp-content/uploads/omgf/*.php HTTP/1.1

Example grep hunts on Apache or Nginx logs:

grep -E 'POST .*multipart/form-data|/admin-ajax\.php|/wp-content/uploads/.*\.(php|phtml|phar|php5)' /var/log/nginx/access.log

grep -E 'POST .*multipart/form-data|/admin-ajax\.php|/wp-content/uploads/.*\.(php|phtml|phar|php5)' /var/log/apache2/access.log

A basic Splunk query to find suspicious upload followed by execution behavior:

index=web sourcetype IN ("nginx","apache")
(
  (method=POST AND uri_path IN ("/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php","/wp-admin/async-upload.php"))
  OR uri_path="*/wp-content/uploads/*"
)
| eval suspicious_file=if(match(uri_path,"\.(php|phtml|phar|php5)$"),1,0)
| stats count min(_time) as first_seen max(_time) as last_seen values(uri_path) values(status) values(clientip) by host, suspicious_file
| sort - last_seen

You should also search the filesystem for recently modified executable files in writable paths:

find /var/www/html/wp-content -type f \
  \( -name "*.php" -o -name "*.phtml" -o -name "*.phar" -o -name "*.php5" \) \
  -mtime -7 -ls

Mitigation and patching

The ideal mitigation is to upgrade to the vendor’s fixed version, but that version number is not yet confirmed in the source-backed data available here. Because of that, the right message for practitioners is: do not remain on 5.2.6 or earlier waiting for more detail without taking interim action. If a patched release is published, upgrade immediately after validating compatibility in staging. If no patch is yet confirmed, consider temporarily disabling the plugin where business impact allows, especially on public-facing sites.

Compensating controls are also important. Arbitrary file upload flaws become far less useful to attackers if uploaded files cannot execute. In WordPress, one common defense is to block PHP execution in wp-content/uploads/ and related writable directories. This will not fix the vulnerability, but it can disrupt the most dangerous post-upload outcomes. You should also review file permissions, ensure the web server user cannot write outside expected locations, and place heightened monitoring on any path the plugin uses for asset generation or caching.

Technical Notes

To check the installed plugin version via WP-CLI:

wp plugin list --path=/var/www/html | grep -i omgf

To temporarily deactivate the plugin if risk tolerance requires it:

wp plugin deactivate host-google-fonts-pro --path=/var/www/html

If and when the vendor publishes a fixed version, the upgrade pattern would be:

wp plugin update host-google-fonts-pro --path=/var/www/html

Because the fixed version number is not confirmed, verify the target release in vendor or advisory documentation before relying on the update.

To block PHP execution in uploads on Apache, add an .htaccess file under wp-content/uploads/:

<FilesMatch "\.(php|phtml|phar|php5)$">
    Require all denied
</FilesMatch>

For Nginx, a location block pattern can help prevent execution from uploads:

location ~* ^/wp-content/uploads/.*\.(php|phtml|phar|php5)$ {
    deny all;
}

These workarounds should be tested carefully in staging. They are compensating controls, not substitutes for a vendor fix.

Incident response considerations

If you discover suspicious file uploads, do not just delete the file and move on. Arbitrary file upload often means the file was used to establish persistence, create additional admin users, modify theme files, or exfiltrate secrets from wp-config.php. Review WordPress user accounts, scheduled tasks, plugin and theme changes, and outbound connections from the host. If you find evidence of execution, assume credential exposure for WordPress admins, database users, and any API keys stored on the server.

You should also preserve relevant logs before rotating them out. Capture web logs, PHP-FPM logs, WordPress debug logs if enabled, and a timeline of changed files. If the site handles customer data or payment workflows, assess whether legal, compliance, or breach-notification processes may apply. The presence of a critical upload flaw does not automatically mean compromise occurred, but if a suspicious executable file was uploaded and accessed, the threshold for deeper incident response is low.

References

This article may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission on qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

Last verified: 2026-06-25

Disclaimer: This article may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission on qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.