CVE-2026-48276: Critical Adobe ColdFusion RCE
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| CVE ID | CVE-2026-48276 |
| CVSS score | 10.0 Critical |
| Attack vector | Not exposed in the available NVD output |
| Auth required | Not conclusively stated in the fetched sources; user interaction is not required |
| Patch status | Adobe bulletin APSB26-68 is the remediation source, but the exact fixed version number was not conclusively retrievable from the fetched advisory content |
TL;DR - Critical ColdFusion RCE caused by dangerous file upload handling. - Affects ColdFusion 2025.9 and earlier, and 2023.20 and earlier. - No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation or verified public PoC yet, but defenders should treat it as urgent.
Vulnerability at a glance
CVE-2026-48276 is a critical Adobe ColdFusion vulnerability published by NVD on 2026-06-30. NVD describes it as an Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type issue that can lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. The issue requires no user interaction, which materially raises operational risk because an attacker does not need phishing or a victim click to start exploitation.
The most important operational fact is that this is a CVSS 10.0 issue in a server product commonly exposed to internal and sometimes internet-facing application traffic. Even without a published exploit, defenders should assume that file-upload flaws in ColdFusion are attractive to attackers because they often provide a direct path to dropping executable content, web shells, or attacker-controlled templates that the server may process.
What this vulnerability is
Based on the NVD description, the root issue is unsafe handling of uploaded files, specifically allowing a dangerous file type to be uploaded where ColdFusion can later execute or process it. NVD’s language points to unrestricted dangerous file upload, while a third-party bulletin snippet reportedly used improper input validation terminology. Those descriptions are consistent rather than contradictory: weak input validation is a common reason dangerous uploads become possible.
In practice, this kind of bug matters because file-upload features are often embedded deep inside business applications running on top of ColdFusion. A vulnerable workflow may not look like an obvious “upload endpoint” at first glance. It could be part of a document management function, customer portal, HR workflow, support ticket attachment feature, or admin import tool. If ColdFusion accepts attacker-supplied content and stores it where the application server can execute or interpret it, arbitrary code execution becomes possible without needing a separate memory corruption exploit.
Technical Notes
The NVD description does not provide a public request path, vulnerable template name, parameter name, or exploit chain. Defenders should avoid overfitting detection to a single URL and instead review any ColdFusion-backed feature that accepts multipart uploads, archive imports, extension uploads, template imports, or file management actions.
A generic upload request pattern worth reviewing in reverse proxies, WAF logs, and application access logs is:
POST /<application-path> HTTP/1.1
Host: example
Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=----WebKitFormBoundary
------WebKitFormBoundary
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="file"; filename="payload.cfm"
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
<ColdFusion template or script content>
------WebKitFormBoundary--
Who is affected
The affected version ranges stated in the available NVD data are explicit:
- Adobe ColdFusion 2025.9 and earlier
- Adobe ColdFusion 2023.20 and earlier
That means organizations running ColdFusion 2025 Update 9 or any earlier 2025 build should treat their deployments as vulnerable. The same applies to ColdFusion 2023 Update 20 or any earlier 2023 build. If you manage multiple application teams, assume there may be version drift across environments, especially where ColdFusion was bundled with line-of-business apps and patched less frequently than the underlying OS.
What remains unclear from the fetched source set is the exact fixed version number for CVE-2026-48276. The Adobe bulletin reference is APSB26-68, and the safest interpretation is that the remediation is in a build released after the explicitly affected versions listed above. Because the advisory content could not be fully retrieved in the research note, defenders should not guess at the fixed update level. Instead, confirm against Adobe’s current update page and bulletin before maintenance windows begin.
Why the CVSS 10.0 rating matters
A 10.0 score means Adobe ColdFusion defenders should prioritize this issue ahead of routine patching work. Even though the full vector string was not exposed in the retrieved NVD output, the available details already indicate a worst-case application-server scenario: remote code execution, no user interaction, and scope changed. For an internet-facing ColdFusion deployment, that combination generally implies the possibility of full application compromise and, depending on service account rights, follow-on access to connected resources.
The phrase “in the context of the current user” is also important. On some ColdFusion deployments, the service account is overprivileged, with write access to application directories, temp storage, scheduled task locations, or integrated back-end resources. In those environments, exploitation may quickly move from initial code execution to credential theft, database access, persistence, or lateral movement. If your ColdFusion runtime uses a powerful local or domain account, your exposure is higher than the CVE text alone suggests.
Exploitation status
At the time of writing, there is no confirmed evidence in the provided source set that CVE-2026-48276 is being exploited in the wild. The research note indicates the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV as of 2026-06-30. That means there is no CISA-confirmed exploited status from the lookup performed for this article.
There is also no verified public PoC identified in the gathered sources. A targeted search did not verify a GitHub PoC or an attributable exploit repository for this specific CVE. That is helpful, but it should not reduce urgency. Critical upload-to-RCE flaws in widely deployed middleware can often be reproduced quickly from advisory text and patch diffing alone. When public exploit code is absent, defenders should assume a short window before private or semi-private weaponization appears.
Bottom line
CVE-2026-48276 is a critical Adobe ColdFusion RCE tied to dangerous file upload handling. The clearly affected versions are ColdFusion 2025.9 and earlier and ColdFusion 2023.20 and earlier. No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation and no verified public PoC were identified in the provided sources as of 2026-06-30, but defenders should still treat this as high priority due to the CVSS 10.0, no user interaction, and arbitrary code execution profile. The right next step is to verify the remediated build in APSB26-68, patch quickly, and audit upload-exposed ColdFusion workflows immediately.
For more information on related vulnerabilities, check out our articles on what does a SOC do and the Palo Alto exploited Chrome zero-day.
This article may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission on qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Detection and threat hunting
Detection should focus on three areas: upload activity, unexpected executable artifacts, and post-upload execution behavior. Because the public data does not name a specific endpoint, defenders need broad visibility into ColdFusion-backed applications and any reverse proxies in front of them. Review recent upload traffic, especially to rarely used application paths, admin functions, import features, or endpoints that accept uncommon file types.
You should also hunt for suspicious files written into web-accessible directories, temporary upload folders, archive extraction paths, and application roots. ColdFusion-specific abuse often leaves behind .cfm, .cfc, .jsp, .js, .zip, or disguised content uploaded with misleading MIME types. Even if the initial upload used an allowed extension, secondary extraction or rename behavior may create executable artifacts later in the chain.
Technical Notes
Concrete patterns to review include HTTP uploads that contain executable ColdFusion-related filenames or suspicious content types. Example grep patterns for access logs or reverse-proxy logs:
grep -Ei 'multipart/form-data|filename=|\.cfm|\.cfc|\.jsp|application/octet-stream' /var/log/nginx/access.log
grep -Ei 'POST .*upload|POST .*import|POST .*admin|filename=' /var/log/httpd/*access*
Example Splunk search for suspicious uploads against ColdFusion-backed services:
index=web sourcetype IN ("nginx:access","apache:access","iis")
(method=POST AND (uri_path="*upload*" OR uri_path="*import*" OR uri_path="*admin*"))
("multipart/form-data" OR "filename=" OR ".cfm" OR ".cfc" OR ".jsp")
| stats count values(uri_path) values(status) values(user_agent) by src_ip host
Example Sigma-style logic to adapt for file creation telemetry on the ColdFusion host:
title: Suspicious executable upload artifact on ColdFusion host
logsource:
product: windows
category: file_event
detection:
selection:
TargetFilename|contains:
- '\ColdFusion'
- '\wwwroot\'
TargetFilename|endswith:
- '.cfm'
- '.cfc'
- '.jsp'
condition: selection
level: high
If you have EDR coverage, also hunt for child processes spawned by the ColdFusion service, servlet container, or Java process shortly after upload events. Even benign upload workflows should not normally be followed by shelling out, persistence changes, or outbound network beacons.
Mitigation and patching
The primary mitigation path is Adobe’s APSB26-68 bulletin and the corresponding ColdFusion 2025 and ColdFusion 2023 update tracks. The known vulnerable ranges are ColdFusion 2025.9 and earlier and ColdFusion 2023.20 and earlier. The exact fixed version number for this CVE was not conclusively confirmed from the fetched advisory content, so teams should verify the remediated build directly from Adobe before rollout. In the absence of that confirmation, assume that simply being on 2025.9 or 2023.20 is not sufficient, because NVD explicitly lists those versions as affected.
If you cannot patch immediately, reduce exposure around upload functionality. Restrict public access to ColdFusion applications that accept file uploads, especially administrative and internal-only workflows accidentally exposed through reverse proxies. Where possible, block direct internet access, require VPN or identity-aware proxy access, and ensure upload directories are not executable by the application server. Review whether uploaded content is being stored under any web-served path and move it outside executable roots if the application supports that.
Technical Notes
Before patching, identify the installed ColdFusion version from the host or application management process. On Linux, admins commonly verify package and install metadata via shell access, though exact commands vary by deployment method:
ps -ef | grep -i coldfusion
find /opt /usr/local -maxdepth 3 -type f \( -name "cfusion-info.properties" -o -name "neo-runtime.xml" \) 2>/dev/null
For update execution, use Adobe’s supported ColdFusion updater method for your installed branch after confirming the remediated version in APSB26-68. Because deployment methods vary, a safe operational pattern is:
# Example workflow, verify exact updater path and target build in Adobe documentation first
cd /opt/adobe/coldfusion/cfusion/bin
./coldfusion update
If your environment does not support immediate upgrade, use compensating controls such as reverse-proxy blocks for upload endpoints and stricter execution boundaries. Example NGINX hardening to block executable extensions from upload directories:
location ~* ^/uploads/.*\.(cfm|cfc|jsp)$ {
deny all;
return 403;
}
On Apache, restrict execution under known upload paths:
<Directory "/var/www/app/uploads">
AllowOverride None
Options -ExecCGI
Require all denied
</Directory>
These workarounds are not substitutes for patching, especially when the exact vulnerable endpoint is unknown, but they can reduce blast radius during emergency response.
Prioritized response plan
First, inventory every ColdFusion instance in production, staging, and DR. Many organizations miss embedded or vendor-managed ColdFusion installs because ownership sits with application teams rather than infrastructure. Include external-facing systems first, but do not ignore internal apps reachable by contractors, VPN users, or compromised desktops.
Second, review Adobe APSB26-68 and confirm the first fixed build for each supported branch. Change management teams should prepare emergency deployment because the vulnerable ranges explicitly include 2025.9 and earlier and 2023.20 and earlier. While no verified exploitation is currently known from the provided sources, a critical no-user-interaction RCE on enterprise middleware deserves accelerated remediation and post-patch validation.
References
- NVD CVE record: CVE-2026-48276
- Adobe Security Bulletin APSB26-68
- Adobe ColdFusion 2025 updates page: ColdFusion 2025 Updates
- Adobe ColdFusion 2023 updates page: ColdFusion 2023 Updates
- Independent ColdFusion update tracker: ColdFusion Security Updates