CVE-2026-14637: Remote Deserialization in Ecommerce-CodeIgniter-Bootstrap
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| CVE ID | CVE-2026-14637 |
| CVSS score | 8.2 (High) |
| Attack vector | Remote |
| Auth required | Unknown from published source data; defenders should assume unauthenticated exposure is possible until verified in their deployment |
| Patch status | Patch available via commit 49b20f53de2b7ec34e920b11c863f1491d911a04 |
TL;DR - High-severity unsafe deserialization in
getCartItemswithinapplication/libraries/ShoppingCart.php. - Affects Ecommerce-CodeIgniter-Bootstrap code up to commit13fd582aaf49aeab7438acc0fc3eb973a1f5e6a7. - Public exploit disclosure exists; patch to commit49b20f53de2b7ec34e920b11c863f1491d911a04now.
Vulnerability at a glance
CVE-2026-14637 is a high-severity deserialization vulnerability in the kirilkirkov/Ecommerce-CodeIgniter-Bootstrap project. According to the NVD description, the issue resides in the getCartItems function in application/libraries/ShoppingCart.php, where manipulation of the shopping_cart argument can lead to unsafe deserialization. The bug is remotely reachable, which materially raises risk for any internet-exposed deployment using vulnerable code.
The most important operational detail is that this project uses a rolling-release model, and the available primary-source record does not provide conventional tagged version numbers for vulnerable and fixed releases. Instead, the affected range is identified by commit boundary: all code up to commit 13fd582aaf49aeab7438acc0fc3eb973a1f5e6a7 is affected, and the fix is identified as commit 49b20f53de2b7ec34e920b11c863f1491d911a04. If your deployment tracks the repository directly or vendors this code into another application, you need to map your installed code to those commits.
What this vulnerability means in practice
Unsafe deserialization flaws are dangerous because they take attacker-controlled data and interpret it as a serialized object or complex structure without sufficient trust boundaries. In PHP applications, that can enable object injection, state manipulation, application crashes, or abuse of magic methods in loaded classes. The exact end state depends on what classes are present, how the framework handles deserialized objects, and whether useful gadget chains exist.
For CVE-2026-14637, the published source data supports calling this a remote deserialization vulnerability, but it does not explicitly confirm remote code execution. Practitioners should avoid overstating impact. What is supportable is that attacker control of the shopping_cart argument in getCartItems can trigger unsafe deserialization, and that public exploit information exists. In absence of a confirmed RCE statement, defenders should still treat the issue as urgent because deserialization bugs often become more severe once researchers or attackers identify usable gadget chains in the deployed environment.
Technical Notes
The vulnerable component identified in the published record is:
application/libraries/ShoppingCart.php
The vulnerable function is:
getCartItems
The attacker-controlled argument called out by NVD is:
shopping_cart
Because the full patch diff text is not available in the research note, defenders should verify whether their code path directly unserializes cookie, session, POST, or query-string data associated with shopping_cart.
Who is affected
The affected product is kirilkirkov Ecommerce-CodeIgniter-Bootstrap. The best available affected range from the published CVE data is all code up to commit 13fd582aaf49aeab7438acc0fc3eb973a1f5e6a7. There is no named release version in the source material, and the NVD record explicitly states that formal affected and updated release versions are not available because the project uses continuous delivery and rolling releases.
That means defenders need to think beyond package-manager version checks. If your team cloned the repository directly, built from source, or copied the project into a custom storefront, you may have no package manifest that clearly answers whether you are exposed. You need to inspect the local Git history or compare the deployed ShoppingCart.php content against upstream. If you run a fork or modified branch, assume you are affected unless you can verify that commit 49b20f53de2b7ec34e920b11c863f1491d911a04 or an equivalent fix is present.
| Scope | Status |
|---|---|
| Product | kirilkirkov/Ecommerce-CodeIgniter-Bootstrap |
| Affected range | Up to commit 13fd582aaf49aeab7438acc0fc3eb973a1f5e6a7 |
| Fixed version | Unknown from available source data |
| Fixed code state | Includes commit 49b20f53de2b7ec34e920b11c863f1491d911a04 |
Technical Notes
To determine whether your clone contains the fix:
git rev-parse HEAD
git log --oneline --decorate -n 20
git branch --contains 49b20f53de2b7ec34e920b11c863f1491d911a04
git merge-base --is-ancestor 49b20f53de2b7ec34e920b11c863f1491d911a04 HEAD && echo "patched" || echo "not patched"
If you deployed from an exported archive without .git metadata, compare the vulnerable file manually:
grep -R "function getCartItems" -n application/libraries/ShoppingCart.php
sha256sum application/libraries/ShoppingCart.php
Exploitation status and urgency
There is public exploit disclosure for this CVE according to NVD, which states that “the exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.” That is the strongest supportable statement on PoC status from the available source material. So, yes: a public PoC or exploit disclosure is known to exist according to the official record referenced in the research note.
By contrast, confirmed exploitation in the wild is not established from the available data. The CVE is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog as of 2026-07-04, which means there is no CISA-confirmed in-the-wild exploitation designation at this time. Security teams should be careful here: “not on KEV” does not mean “not being exploited.” It only means no CISA KEV listing exists yet. Given the public exploit disclosure and remote reachability, defenders should assume opportunistic scanning is plausible and prioritize internet-facing instances.
Operational guidance for defenders
For incident response, start by identifying where this code is deployed, whether it is internet accessible, and whether your environment has retained logs showing shopping_cart requests. If you find suspicious requests containing serialized object patterns, preserve access logs, reverse proxy logs, PHP error logs, and the current application codebase for review. Because deserialization vulnerabilities can enable logic abuse even without confirmed code execution, investigate anomalous cart changes, session anomalies, and unexplained application errors around the same time window.
For remediation tracking, do not rely on “latest” alone. Record that affected code is up to commit 13fd582aaf49aeab7438acc0fc3eb973a1f5e6a7 and that the environment must include commit 49b20f53de2b7ec34e920b11c863f1491d911a04 or an equivalent backport. If your organization maintains a fork, review any customizations to ShoppingCart.php and related session/cart handling to ensure the upstream fix was not accidentally dropped during merge conflict resolution.
How to detect attempted exploitation
Detection is challenging because deserialization attempts often look like malformed or unusual application input rather than a clean exploit signature. Your most useful telemetry will typically come from HTTP access logs, application error logs, PHP warnings, and any reverse proxy or WAF events that capture request parameters. Focus on requests or cookie values associated with shopping_cart, especially if they contain serialized PHP object markers, abnormally long payloads, or encoded blob data inconsistent with normal cart behavior.
You should also watch for downstream symptoms: spikes in 500 responses on cart-related endpoints, repeated requests that modify cart state without completing checkout, or unexpected exceptions in ShoppingCart.php. Because the vulnerable function is getCartItems, requests that repeatedly invoke cart display, cart refresh, or session/cart restoration logic may be relevant. If you do not have application-layer logging for shopping_cart, prioritize temporary instrumentation until patching is complete.
Technical Notes
Example web log grep for suspicious cart parameter use:
grep -RniE 'shopping_cart=|shopping_cart%3D' /var/log/nginx/access.log /var/log/apache2/*access*.log
Example pattern to look for serialized PHP object indicators in HTTP logs or captured request bodies:
O:[0-9]+:
a:[0-9]+:{
s:[0-9]+:
Example Sigma-style detection logic for suspicious serialized payloads in a cart parameter:
title: Suspicious Serialized Payload in shopping_cart Parameter
logsource:
category: webserver
detection:
selection1:
cs-uri-query|contains: "shopping_cart="
selection2:
cs-uri-query|re: 'shopping_cart=.*(O%3A[0-9]+%3A|a%3A[0-9]+%3A%7B|O:[0-9]+:|a:[0-9]+:)'
condition: selection1 and selection2
level: high
Example Splunk search:
index=web (uri_query="*shopping_cart=*")
| regex uri_query="(shopping_cart=.*(O%3A[0-9]+%3A|a%3A[0-9]+%3A%7B|O:[0-9]+:|a:[0-9]+:))"
| stats count by src_ip, http_method, uri_path, uri_query
Example PHP or web error log hunting for cart-related failures:
grep -RniE 'ShoppingCart\.php|getCartItems|unserialize|shopping_cart' /var/log/php* /var/log/apache2/error.log /var/log/nginx/error.log
Mitigation and patching
The primary remediation is to move to a code state that includes commit 49b20f53de2b7ec34e920b11c863f1491d911a04. Because no fixed release version is named in the available source data, the correct phrasing is: there is no published fixed version number available here; the known fix is the patch commit. For security operations and change records, document both the vulnerable ceiling commit and the patch commit so future responders can validate remediation without relying on a semantic version that may not exist.
If you cannot patch immediately, reduce exposure around the shopping_cart input path. That may include blocking suspicious serialized payload patterns at the reverse proxy or WAF, limiting direct internet exposure to the affected storefront, and increasing monitoring of cart-related routes and error logs. These are temporary risk-reduction steps, not replacements for the code fix. Deserialization flaws are code-level trust boundary failures, and workarounds can miss alternate encodings or logic paths.
Technical Notes
Upgrade or patch the repository directly:
git fetch origin
git checkout <your-production-branch>
git cherry-pick 49b20f53de2b7ec34e920b11c863f1491d911a04
If your deployment tracks upstream and you want to move to a known-good state that contains the fix:
git fetch origin
git log --oneline --decorate --all | grep 49b20f53de2b7ec34e920b11c863f1491d911a04
git pull origin <branch-containing-fix>
Temporary NGINX mitigation to block common serialized object markers in query strings or cookies referencing shopping_cart:
if ($query_string ~* "shopping_cart=.*(O%3A[0-9]+%3A|a%3A[0-9]+%3A%7B)") {
return 403;
}
Temporary Apache mod_security style rule example:
SecRule ARGS:shopping_cart "@rx (O:[0-9]+:|a:[0-9]+:\{)" \
"id:14637,phase:2,deny,status:403,msg:'Possible PHP serialized payload in shopping_cart'"
These rules are heuristics only. They may generate false positives or miss alternate encodings. Apply them cautiously and test before production rollout.
References
The primary public references identified in the source material are the upstream repository, the GitHub patch commit, and the GitHub Security Advisory. Because the available record already validates those references, defenders should use them to confirm code lineage and patch status in their own environment.
- Upstream repository: https://github.com/kirilkirkov/Ecommerce-CodeIgniter-Bootstrap/
- Patch commit: https://github.com/kirilkirkov/Ecommerce-CodeIgniter-Bootstrap/commit/49b20f53de2b7ec34e920b11c863f1491d911a04
- GitHub Security Advisory: https://github.com/kirilkirkov/Ecommerce-CodeIgniter-Bootstrap/security/advisories/GHSA-9g5q-g6m3-v5cr
For further reading on vulnerability management, consider checking our guide on how to build a vulnerability patching playbook step by step. Additionally, if you’re interested in understanding more about threat intelligence platforms, our comparison of the best threat intelligence platforms for 2026 may be useful.
This article may contain affiliate links. We earn a commission on qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.